Free tool by Clarvivo · no login
Paste a baseline and comparison URL—such as staging and production, or before and after a release. We open each public page independently and show the tracking signals that appeared, disappeared or changed.
Paste the equivalent before-and-after, staging-and-production, or old-and-new URLs. We compare the public tracking stack and page signals without submitting forms or using credentials.
This tool answers: What tracking signals changed between these two versions of my page?
Enable JavaScript to run the check — the diagnosis itself is free and needs no account.
Tracking failures often begin with a harmless-looking release: a container moved, a consent script changed order, a redirect was added, or a theme update removed a tag. By the time a weekly report drops, the only evidence may be a changed total.
A before-and-after comparison turns that vague suspicion into a concrete diff. It cannot prove account-side attribution or server events, but it can show whether the browser-side foundations changed at the moment the deployment did.
These answer the questions this one tends to raise.
So you can trust the result — and your developer can verify it.
Each supplied public URL is guarded and opened in an isolated browser. We do not carry cookies, credentials or form state from one version to the other.
The result compares detected tracker families, account identifiers, named events, redirect outcomes, document metadata and browser errors rather than treating a visual match as a tracking match.
A tag absent from this scan may be consent-gated or interaction-driven. The result reports the condition and recommends the narrowest follow-up test instead of claiming every unseen event is removed.
Clarvivo keeps acquisition and revenue signals visible over time, so deployment changes can be checked against the outcomes they affect.
Monitor tracking against revenue